Skip to content
FinToolSuite
Updated 2026-08-31 · Debt · Educational use only ·
Privacy

Interest-Only Mortgage Trap Calculator

How much more interest-only costs over a repayment mortgage.

Compare interest-only against repayment mortgage cost on the same balance, rate, and term. Returns the extra cost (trap) plus monthly and total figures.

What this tool does

This calculator models the cost difference between interest-only and repayment mortgage structures over a fixed term. Enter the loan amount, the annual interest rate and the term in years, and it returns the monthly payment and the total paid under each structure, plus the gap between them. The interest-only total includes the original balance still outstanding at maturity, because under this structure the principal never reduces; leaving it out would understate the cost of the choice. Interest-only payments stay flat for the whole term, while a repayment schedule front-loads interest and gradually retires the balance. The model assumes a fixed rate and equal payments throughout, and takes no view on property values, fees, early-repayment charges or tax treatment. Results are educational illustration of how loan structure affects total cost.

Quick answer: with the default values, the result is $99,245.98 (Extra Cost of Interest-Only). Adjust the values below for your own figures.


Enter Values

People also use

Formula Used
Original loan amount
Monthly interest rate (annual rate ÷ 12 ÷ 100)
Total number of monthly payments (term × 12)
Interest-only monthly payment = L × r
Repayment monthly payment under standard amortisation = L × r ÷ (1 − (1 + r)^−n)

Disclaimer

Results are estimates for educational purposes only. They do not constitute financial advice. Consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions.

An interest-only mortgage pays the lender the interest each month and nothing else. The balance does not move. The monthly payment is lower than on an equivalent repayment mortgage, and at the end of the term the full original loan is still owed, in one lump. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau states it plainly: the amount owed does not go down with each payment. This calculator sizes that trade, showing how much more leaves the borrower’s hands across the life of an interest-only mortgage than across a like-for-like repayment mortgage on the same balance, rate and term.

How to use it

Enter the loan amount, the annual rate, and the term in years. Four figures come back alongside the headline gap: the monthly payment under each structure, and the total paid under each, where the interest-only total includes the original balance still owed at the end. Without that last part the comparison would be meaningless, since the whole point of the structure is that the principal survives the term intact. The currency selector changes formatting only. The arithmetic is currency neutral, so the same balance, rate and term produce the same proportional gap in any currency.

Worked example

Take a 200,000 loan at 5% over 25 years, in whatever currency is selected. Interest-only costs 200,000 × 5% ÷ 12 = 833.33 a month, every month, for all 300 months. That comes to 250,000 of interest, and the 200,000 is still outstanding on the last day, so 450,000 leaves the borrower in total.

Repayment on the same terms costs 1,169.18 a month. Across the same 300 payments that totals 350,754.02, and the loan is gone. The gap is 99,245.98. What buys it is 335.85 less to find every month for twenty-five years, which is the appeal and the risk in a single number.

How the math works

Interest-only monthly payment = loan amount × monthly rate, where the monthly rate is the annual rate ÷ 12 ÷ 100. Interest-only total = that payment × number of months, plus the original balance, because the balance is still owed. Repayment monthly uses the standard fixed-rate amortisation formula M = L × r ÷ (1 − (1 + r)−n). Repayment total = monthly payment × months. The trap is the first total minus the second. The formula box below reproduces the same expressions.

When the trap is largest

The gap widens with both rate and term. On the same 200,000 over 25 years, moving the rate from 5% to 7% takes the trap from 99,245.98 to 125,932.48. Holding the rate at 5% and cutting the term from 25 years to 15 pulls it down to 65,314.29. Rate raises the interest paid every month; term multiplies that monthly difference across more months.

Loan size scales it exactly. Every term in the calculation is linear in the balance, so doubling the loan doubles the trap and halving it halves the trap, with rate and term unchanged. That makes the trap as a fraction of the balance the more portable figure: at 5% over 25 years it is just under half the original loan, whatever the loan happens to be.

Where interest-only mortgages are still common

Buy-to-let landlords use interest-only routinely, because the property is intended to be sold or refinanced at the end and the rent is sized against the monthly cost rather than against principal repayment. Bridging loans during a property transition are interest-only by design. Some commercial property loans run interest-only to a balloon payment at maturity.

Owner-occupied residential lending is a different story since the tightening that followed 2008. The Financial Stability Board’s principles for sound residential mortgage underwriting, agreed internationally, place the emphasis on verified repayment capacity rather than on collateral value alone, and national regimes built on that approach generally expect evidence of a credible repayment vehicle before new interest-only lending is written.

What this calculator doesn’t capture

The model assumes a constant rate, equal payments, and both schedules running to the end exactly as written. Real mortgages carry fixed-rate periods that reset, arrangement and product fees, early-repayment charges where the borrower switches structure mid-term, and tax treatments that differ between owner-occupied and investment use, since interest is deductible against rental income in some countries and not in others. What the figures give is the headline difference between two payment structures. A specific product, with its own fees and its own tax position, can move it.

Example Scenario

$200,000 at 5% annual interest over 25 years: on these inputs, interest-only costs $99,245.98 more in total than repayment on the same terms, because the original balance is still owed in full on the final day of the term.

Inputs

Loan Amount:$200,000
Annual Interest Rate:5%
Mortgage Term:25 years
Expected Result$99,245.98
Expected Result breakdown
Interest-Only Monthly$833.33
Repayment Monthly$1,169.18
Interest-Only Total$450,000.00
Repayment Total$350,754.02

This example uses sample figures for illustration. Adjust the inputs above to match a specific situation and see how the result changes.

Sources & Methodology

Methodology

The calculator computes the interest-only monthly payment by multiplying the loan amount by the monthly interest rate, which is the annual rate divided by 12 then by 100. The total interest-only cost equals that monthly payment multiplied by the number of months in the term, plus the original loan amount, since the principal never reduces. The repayment monthly payment is derived using the standard amortisation formula for a fixed-rate loan, which covers both interest and principal reduction, and the repayment total equals that payment multiplied by the number of months. The trap cost, meaning the additional expense of choosing interest-only, is the difference between the interest-only total and the repayment total. A rate of zero is rejected, because at 0% the two structures cost the same and there is no gap to model. The model assumes a constant annual rate, equal monthly payments across the full term, and both schedules running to completion. It does not account for rate resets, arrangement fees, early-repayment penalties, overpayments, payment holidays, or differences in tax treatment between property types.

Frequently Asked Questions

When does interest-only typically make sense?
The most common contexts are buy-to-let investments where the property will be sold or refinanced at the end of the term, bridging loans during property transitions, and some commercial property loans with balloon payments at maturity. For owner-occupied residential mortgages it fits less naturally, because nothing in the structure pays off the principal. That responsibility sits entirely with whatever repayment vehicle the borrower has lined up.
What is a repayment vehicle?
It is the plan for clearing the original balance at the end of the term. Common vehicles include an investment portfolio, a tax-advantaged retirement or savings account, the planned sale of the property itself, the planned sale of another asset, or an expected inheritance. Mortgage regulators across many jurisdictions require evidence of a credible repayment plan before approving new interest-only lending, and relying on property-price appreciation alone is generally not accepted.
How common are interest-only mortgages now?
Less common for residential borrowers than before the 2008 financial crisis. The regulatory tightening that followed pushed underwriting towards verified repayment capacity, and many lenders narrowed or withdrew their interest-only ranges for owner-occupiers as a result. Buy-to-let and commercial lending still use the structure widely. Market shares vary by country and by year, and national regulators publish current figures in their mortgage-market statistics where a precise number is needed.
Can a borrower switch from interest-only to repayment?
Generally yes, and often at remortgage. The monthly payment rises, by the difference between the two monthly figures the calculator reports, and in exchange the balance starts reducing. Some lenders also allow a mid-term switch without remortgaging. Whether early-repayment charges apply to a switch made inside a fixed-rate period depends on the specific loan agreement, and the existing lender can confirm that.
What does this calculator not include?
Fixed-rate-period resets, arrangement and product fees, early-repayment charges, and tax treatment differences between owner-occupied and investment use are all outside the calculation. Interest on a buy-to-let mortgage is deductible against rental income in some countries and not in others, which changes the effective cost and is not modelled here. The figures are an estimate of the headline difference between the two structures, suited to a first-pass comparison rather than a final decision.

Related Calculators

More Debt Calculators

Explore Other Financial Tools

Spotted something off?

Calculations or display — let us know.