Skip to content
FinToolSuite
Updated 2026-08-26 · Mortgage · Educational use only ·
Privacy

Home Affordability Calculator

Maximum affordable house price from income, deposit, and debts

Calculate maximum affordable house price from income, deposit, and existing debts using both income-multiple and DTI methods.

What this tool does

This calculator estimates the maximum house price you could afford based on your financial situation. It uses two lending tests (an income multiple and a payment-capacity test) and returns the lower figure as the more restrictive estimate. You enter your annual gross income, existing monthly debt obligations, deposit amount, interest rate, loan term and the multiple to apply. Published income multiples commonly run between 4 and 5.5 times gross income; the payment-capacity test takes 28 percent of gross monthly income, subtracts existing debt payments, and converts what remains into a loan on standard amortisation. Existing debts are deducted on the payment test only, because that is where lenders assess them, and the panel names which of the two tests produced the answer. The calculation does not account for fees, insurance, property taxes, ongoing maintenance, or variations in lending criteria across institutions. Results are for educational illustration only.

Quick answer: with the default values, the result is $256,221.45 (Maximum Affordable Home Price). Adjust the values below for your own figures.


Enter Values

People also use

Formula Used
Maximum affordable price, the lower loan plus the deposit
Annual gross household income
Income multiple the lender caps borrowing at
Existing monthly debt payments
Deposit put toward the purchase
Monthly interest rate, the annual rate entered divided by 1200
Number of monthly payments, the term in years multiplied by 12
Loan the payment capacity supports on standard amortisation

Disclaimer

Results are estimates for educational purposes only. They do not constitute financial advice. Consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions.

Affordability has three layers and only the first is arithmetic. A lender sets a ceiling from income, deposit and existing commitments. Beneath that sits what the monthly payment leaves room for once the rest of life is paid for, which is usually a lower figure. Beneath that again sits what would still work if the rate reset higher or income dropped, lower still. This calculator addresses the first layer; the sections below describe the other two.

The income multiple test and its limits

Many lenders cap borrowing at a multiple of gross household income. Published multiples commonly run between 4 and 5.5 times, with most lending clustered at the lower end of that band and the higher figures reserved for applicants a lender judges lower-risk. On 80,000 of combined income, 4.5 to 5 times is roughly 360,000 to 400,000 of borrowing, and with a 10% deposit it puts property in the 400,000 to 445,000 range. That is the lender's ceiling rather than a spending figure. The multiple works as a test because income tracks repayment capacity reasonably well, but it says nothing about existing debts, childcare, commute costs, or how much flexibility a household wants to keep. Lending standards tightened after 2008, and a figure that clears an underwriting model can still sit above what a particular household would pick.

The 28/36 rule, and what this tool does with it

A tighter personal filter caps housing at 28% of gross monthly income and total debt payments at 36%. On 80,000 gross, which is 6,667 a month, that is 1,867 of housing and 2,400 of total debt service. What this calculator does with the 28% is narrower than the original rule: it applies the whole of it to mortgage principal and interest and reserves none of it for property tax, insurance or maintenance, so the figure here is a ceiling on the loan payment alone. Those other costs come out of the same 28% in the rule as usually stated. At the sample figures, allowing 300 a month for tax and insurance lowers the maximum price from 256,221 to 208,758, and allowing 500 lowers it to 177,116. The 36% total-debt ratio is described here but not computed by the tool.

Testing the payment against a higher rate

Many lenders check the payment at a rate several percentage points above the one on offer, a practice shaped by the 2008 downturn. The same arithmetic works as a personal check: if a fixed rate later resets higher, would the payment plus property tax, insurance and utilities still fit the monthly budget? An answer of “it would be tight” places the price near the top of the range; an answer of “no” places it above, whatever a lender approves.

How deposit size changes the rate

A larger deposit cuts the loan, and it can also move the borrower into a lower loan-to-value band where lenders often price at a lower rate. On a 400,000 property at 6.5% over 30 years, moving from a 10% deposit to a 20% deposit cuts the monthly payment by about 253 from the smaller loan alone. Where the larger deposit also secures a rate a percentage point lower, the gap is about 459 a month; at two points lower, about 654. Those are payment differences rather than interest savings. Of the roughly 91,000 total-payment gap at the same rate, 40,000 is the extra principal the larger loan repays and about 51,000 is interest; at a point lower the gap is about 165,000 with about 125,000 of interest, and at two points lower about 235,000 with about 195,000 of interest.

The costs that come with the house

The mortgage payment is the largest line but not the only one. Recurring ownership costs typically include local property tax, buildings insurance, maintenance, and any service or ground charge the tenure carries. Maintenance is lumpy rather than monthly: a heating system, a roof or a kitchen arrives every few years rather than every month, and a common planning convention sets aside a percentage of the property value each year to cover it. Utility costs scale with floor area as well. Together these add a monthly figure on top of the mortgage, and affordability arithmetic that counts only the mortgage understates the running cost.

The cash needed to move in

Getting into the property costs money beyond the deposit. Transfer or purchase taxes, which vary widely by price, location and buyer status, legal fees, a survey, any mortgage arrangement fee, removals and basic furniture all fall due around the same time. Affordability arithmetic that counts only the deposit understates the cash required at completion.

A ceiling is not a purchase price

Affordability sets a ceiling; it does not describe a purchase. A price at the top of the ceiling leaves nothing spare for a rate reset, a job change or an unplanned cost, and capacity left unused at a lower price is available for other things. Where a household places itself inside the ceiling is a judgement the arithmetic does not make.

The calculator's limits

This tool estimates borrowing capacity from income, deposit and existing debt payments. It does not run the 36% total-debt test, the stress test at a higher rate, or the ownership-cost layer. It applies no minimum or maximum loan-to-value test either, so a large deposit against a small income still returns a price. The multiple is applied to gross income before tax, and the payment arm assumes a repayment mortgage on standard amortisation rather than interest-only.

Example Scenario

Affordability estimate: $80,000 of gross income with $500 of monthly debt payments and a $40,000 deposit supports a maximum price of $256,221.45.

Inputs

Annual Gross Income:$80,000
Existing Monthly Debt Payments:$500
Deposit / Down Payment:$40,000
Interest Rate:6.5%
Loan Term:30 yrs
Income Multiple:4.5 x
Expected Result$256,221.45
Expected Result breakdown
Binding ConstraintPayment capacity
Max Loan (income multiple)$360,000.00
Max Loan (payment capacity)$216,221.45
Max Monthly Payment$1,366.67
Effective Income Multiple2.70x
Loan-to-Value at This Price84.39%

This example uses sample figures for illustration. Adjust the inputs above to match a specific situation and see how the result changes.

Sources & Methodology

Methodology

The calculator computes maximum affordable house price by applying two lending tests and taking the more restrictive. The first multiplies annual gross income by the multiple entered, giving a cap on the loan from income alone; existing debt payments are not deducted here, because they bite through the second test. The second takes 28 percent of gross monthly income, subtracts existing monthly debt payments, treats the remainder as the maximum monthly mortgage payment, and converts that payment to a loan principal using standard amortisation at the rate and term entered. That 28 percent is applied wholly to principal and interest, with nothing reserved for property tax, insurance or maintenance. A zero interest rate is accepted and handled by spreading the payment capacity evenly across the term rather than discounting it. The lower of the two loan figures is the borrowing capacity, and the deposit is added to it to give the maximum price. The panel names which of the two tests produced the answer, and reports the resulting loan-to-value and effective income multiple. The model assumes a constant interest rate, uniform monthly payments, and stable income and debts. It applies no minimum or maximum loan-to-value test, and does not account for arrangement fees, valuation costs, insurance, taxes, maintenance, income volatility or rate changes. Values that would make the result meaningless are rejected rather than absorbed: a non-positive income, term or multiple, a negative deposit, debt figure or interest rate, and debt payments at or above 28 percent of gross monthly income each return a message instead of a result.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which test binds, the income multiple or the payment capacity?
It depends on the rate and on existing debt payments. The payment-capacity arm converts a monthly figure into a loan, so it shrinks as the rate rises, while the income-multiple arm does not move with the rate at all. At the sample figures the income multiple binds only below about 2.2%, and with no existing debt payments that crossover moves to about 4.7%. Above those points the payment capacity is the tighter test. The panel names which arm produced the answer.
Why do lenders use different income multiples?
Risk appetite, and the mix of applicants a lender wants. Published multiples commonly sit between 4 and 5.5 times income, and tighter tests after 2008 moved much of the market toward the lower end of that band as a default. Joint applications are sometimes assessed on a slightly different basis, with the second income treated at a reduced multiple.
Which debt payments enter the calculation?
Regular monthly credit commitments: card minimums, vehicle finance, student loan repayments and personal loans. Utility bills, subscriptions and other running costs are normally excluded, because they are treated as living expenses rather than credit. Enter the total of the monthly payments a lender would see on a credit file.
How joint applications are assessed
Lenders generally apply the multiple to combined income, which raises the ceiling relative to a single applicant. Some apply a reduced multiple to the second income. Entering the combined figure in the income field models the common case: 60,000 and 40,000 combined at 4.5 times gives a 450,000 ceiling on the multiple arm, before the payment-capacity arm is applied.

Related Calculators

More Mortgage Calculators

Explore Other Financial Tools

Spotted something off?

Calculations or display — let us know.