Skip to content
FinToolSuite
Updated 2026-04-20 · Real Estate · Educational use only ·
Privacy

REITs vs Direct Property Calculator

REITs vs direct property.

Compare REITs against buying property with a mortgage. Enter your cash, returns, leverage, and mortgage rate to see the levered return on equity over time.

What this tool does

This tool models how an initial investment grows over time under two real estate strategies: buying REITs versus purchasing property with borrowed money. It calculates the ending value for each approach by compounding returns annually. The REIT pathway uses the stated annual total return, while the property pathway applies leverage—borrowing to amplify returns on your actual cash—then compounds that leveraged return across your time horizon. The comparison shows how your starting amount, the annual returns each strategy delivers, the level of leverage used, and the number of years you hold the investment all shape the final outcome. This is useful for exploring how different return rates and leverage multiples affect long-term wealth accumulation in a simplified model. Results are illustrative and do not account for costs, taxes, market volatility, or financing conditions.

Quick answer: with the default values, the result is $20,843.87 (Direct Property Wins By). Adjust the values below for your own figures.


Enter Values

People also use

Formula Used
Cash invested (equity)
Property unleveraged return
Leverage multiplier
Mortgage rate on the borrowed portion

Spotted something off?

Calculations or display — let us know.

Disclaimer

Results are estimates for educational purposes only. They do not constitute financial advice. Consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions.

This tool compares two ways to put cash into real estate: REITs (listed property shares) versus buying a property with a mortgage. REITs compound at their total return with no personal leverage. Direct property applies leverage to your deposit, but the borrowed portion carries a mortgage cost, so the return on your equity is the levered property return minus the financing cost.

Worked example: 100,000 in cash. A REIT returning 8% a year grows to about 216,000 over 10 years. For direct property, the same 100,000 is a 25% deposit on a 400,000 purchase (4x leverage) at a 6% unleveraged property return and a 5% mortgage rate. The levered return on equity is 4 × 6% − 3 × 5% = 9%, which compounds to about 237,000 over 10 years — ahead of the REIT here but by a modest margin rather than a wide one once financing is counted.

Leverage works in both directions. The same 4x multiplier that lifts a 6% property return to a 9% return on equity would turn a −3% property year into roughly −27% on equity, which can erode a deposit quickly. Direct property also carries costs this model leaves out: management time, transaction costs, tax treatment, and illiquidity. REITs trade on an exchange and settle in days; a property sale typically takes months.

Quick example

With cash to invest of 100,000, a REIT annual total return of 8%, a property unleveraged return of 6%, a leverage multiplier of 4, and a mortgage rate of 5%, direct property finishes about 20,844 ahead of the REIT over 10 years. Change any figure and watch the output shift — it is often more useful to see the pattern than to memorise the formula.

Which inputs matter most

You enter Cash to Invest, REIT Annual Total Return, Property Unleveraged Return, Property Leverage Multiplier, Mortgage Rate, and Investment Period. The leverage multiplier and the gap between the property return and the mortgage rate usually tip the answer. Adjusting one input at a time shows which moves the result most.

What's happening under the hood

The REIT side compounds at its total return. The property side compounds at the levered return on equity: the property return times the leverage multiplier, minus the mortgage cost on the borrowed portion. The formula is listed in full below, so you can retrace the calculation by hand.

Why run this

Running the numbers makes the trade-offs concrete. Small changes in the mortgage rate or the leverage multiplier can move the result more than intuition suggests, which is hard to judge without working it out.

What this doesn't capture

This is a simplified model that holds its assumptions constant and applies a single net return each year. It excludes transaction costs, taxes, void periods, changing leverage as equity builds, and market volatility, so the figure is best read as one scenario rather than a forecast.

Example Scenario

£100,000: REIT at 8% vs leveraged property (6% return, 4x, 5% mortgage) over 10y = $20,843.87.

Inputs

Cash to Invest:£100,000
REIT Annual Total Return %:8%
Property Unleveraged Return %:6%
Property Leverage Multiplier:4
Mortgage Rate %:5%
Investment Period:10
Expected Result$20,843.87
Expected Result breakdown
Direct Property FV$236,736.37
REIT FV$215,892.50
Levered Return on Equity9.00%
Leverage Used4.0x

This example uses typical values for illustration. Adjust the inputs above to match a specific situation and see how the result changes.

Sources & Methodology

Methodology

The REIT side compounds the initial cash at the stated annual total return. The direct-property side applies leverage to the same cash: the full levered position earns the property return, while the borrowed portion (leverage multiplier minus one) carries the mortgage rate, giving a return on equity of leverage times property return minus (leverage minus one) times mortgage rate. That net return is compounded annually over the holding period. If the levered return on equity would fall below −100% in a year, the model treats the equity as fully wiped rather than rebounding, so the property value is floored at zero. The model assumes constant returns and a constant leverage ratio, and excludes transaction costs, taxes, void periods, and the way leverage falls as equity builds.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does leverage change the property return?
Leverage multiplies the property return and subtracts the financing cost. At 4x leverage, a 6% property return and a 5% mortgage rate give a return on equity of about 9% (4 × 6% − 3 × 5%). The same 4x applied to a −3% property year works out to about −27% on equity, so leverage amplifies losses as well as gains. Historically, sustained rising markets have favoured leverage while sharp downturns have worked against it.
Why can a REIT's return look lower than leveraged property?
Most REITs already carry some leverage at the corporate level, so their quoted total return is already after that borrowing. Adding personal leverage on top is uncommon. With direct property, leverage is applied to your own equity, which is why an unleveraged property return in the mid-single digits can translate into a higher — but also more volatile — return on equity during good periods.
How do the risk profiles compare?
REIT prices move with the equity market and are often cited with volatility in a range similar to shares. Leveraged direct property can show much larger swings in equity value, because a given move in the property price is multiplied by the leverage. Risk-adjusted measures such as the Sharpe ratio attempt to compare the two on a like-for-like basis, though the result depends heavily on the period and assumptions used.
How does liquidity differ?
REITs trade on an exchange and typically settle within a few business days, so a position can be sold quickly. Selling a property usually takes months and carries transaction costs that can run to several percent of the value. That liquidity difference matters most during personal emergencies or fast-moving markets; for some holders, property illiquidity is a feature that discourages selling at the wrong moment.

Related Calculators

More Real Estate Calculators

Explore Other Financial Tools