Skip to content
FinToolSuite
Updated 2026-08-17 · Investing · Educational use only ·
Privacy

Growing Perpetuity Calculator

Perpetuity value with growing cash flows.

Calculate the present value of a growing perpetuity using the Gordon formula, from the first-year cash flow, growth rate, and discount rate.

What this tool does

This calculator applies the Gordon growing perpetuity formula to estimate the present value of an infinite stream of cash flows that grow at a constant rate each period. It divides the first-year cash flow by the spread between the discount rate and the growth rate. The result represents what that perpetual, growing income stream is worth in today's terms. The discount rate, which reflects a required return or cost of capital, and the growth rate are the primary drivers of the valuation, and small changes in either can shift the outcome substantially. A common scenario involves valuing a mature dividend-paying entity or a long-term lease with annual increases. Note that this model assumes cash flows continue indefinitely at a stable growth rate, which rarely holds in practice. The calculator is for educational illustration and does not account for inflation, tax treatment, or market disruption.

Quick answer: with the default values, the result is $100,000.00 (Present Value (Growing Perpetuity)). Adjust the values below for your own figures.


Enter Values

People also use

Formula Used
Cash flow at the end of the first year
Discount rate, as the percentage entered
Growth rate, as the percentage entered
Discount rate as a decimal: the percentage entered divided by 100
Growth rate as a decimal: the percentage entered divided by 100
Present value of the growing perpetuity

Disclaimer

Results are estimates for educational purposes only. They do not constitute financial advice. Consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions.

A growing perpetuity is a cash flow that arrives every year without end and rises by the same percentage each time. Its present value is the first-year cash flow divided by the gap between the discount rate and the growth rate. At the default 8% discount rate against 3% growth that gap is 0.05, so the value is the first-year figure divided by 0.05, or twenty times that figure whatever it happens to be. The division only converges while growth stays below the discount rate.

What moves the number most

Only the spread between the two rates reaches the denominator, so a 1 percentage point fall in the discount rate and a 1 percentage point rise in the growth rate land on exactly the same answer: both take the spread from 5 points to 4, and the multiple from 20 times the first-year cash flow to 25 times. The two directions are not mirror images. Measured from the same five-point starting spread, taking a point off raises the value by 25% while putting a point on lowers it by 16.67%, because value scales as one divided by the spread rather than with the spread itself.

In proportional terms the three levers have closed forms, and not one of them depends on the size of the cash flow. A 1% change in the first-year cash flow moves the value by exactly 1%. A 1% rise in the discount rate lowers the value by the discount rate divided by the spread, and a 1% rise in the growth rate raises it by the growth rate divided by the spread. At an 8% discount rate against 3% growth those ratios come to 1.60 and 0.60, against measured moves of −1.5748% and +0.6036% once the step is taken discretely rather than as a gradient. Two consequences hold at every input vector: the discount rate is the strongest of the three levers whenever growth sits above zero, and growth passes cash flow once it climbs above half the discount rate.

How the formula gets there

The stream being valued is a cash flow at the end of year one, the same amount plus growth at the end of year two, and so on without end. Discounting each of those payments back to today gives an infinite sum, and because every term is a fixed multiple of the one before it, that sum is a geometric series. A geometric series converges only when the ratio between successive terms stays below one, which here means the growth rate has to sit below the discount rate. Where it does, the entire infinite sum collapses to a single division: the first payment over the difference between the two rates. Where it does not, the series has no finite total, which is why the calculator returns a message instead of a figure.

Two points about timing change how the result reads. The first cash flow is treated as arriving one year out rather than today, and the answer is a value in present-day terms. A payment already in hand is not part of the stream and belongs outside the calculation, added separately.

What this doesn't capture

The formula assumes cash flows grow at one constant rate forever and that the discount rate stays fixed, and neither holds cleanly in practice. The result is sensitive to the spread between the two rates: as growth approaches the discount rate, the value rises sharply. It also ignores the risk that the cash flows are cut or stop entirely, along with taxes and inflation beyond the stated growth rate. The number represents one steady-state scenario rather than a forecast.

Where to go next

The Perpetuity Value Calculator handles the same structure without growth, the Gordon Growth Model Calculator applies it to dividends specifically, and the Future Value Calculator runs a single amount forward instead of discounting a stream back.

Example Scenario

A growing perpetuity paying $5,000 in its first year, rising 3% a year and discounted at 8%, has a present value of $100,000.00 today.

Inputs

First Year Cash Flow:$5,000
Growth Rate:3%
Discount Rate:8%
Expected Result$100,000.00
Expected Result breakdown
Spread (Discount − Growth)5.00 pp
Multiple of First-Year Cash Flow20.00x
Value at Zero Growth$62,500.00
Share of Value from Growth37.50%

This example uses sample figures for illustration. Adjust the inputs above to match a specific situation and see how the result changes.

Sources & Methodology

Methodology

The calculator applies the Gordon growth model for perpetuities, which values a stream of cash flows that grow at a constant rate indefinitely. It divides the first-year cash flow by the spread between the discount rate and the growth rate. The computation treats the first cash flow as arriving one year from the valuation date, growing at a steady percentage each period after that, and continuing without interruption, and it states the answer in present-day terms. The closed form is the limit of a geometric series, which converges only while the growth rate stays below the discount rate; where that condition fails the calculator returns a message rather than a figure. The share of value attributed to growth reduces to the growth rate divided by the discount rate, so that row depends on neither the cash flow nor the spread and reads identically in every currency. The model treats both rates as constant over time and does not account for fees, taxes, inflation adjustments beyond the growth rate specified, or changes in market conditions. Results are sensitive to the inputs, particularly when the growth rate approaches the discount rate, where small changes produce large value swings. The assumptions hold most closely where growth has been steady over a long run, and the model draws no distinction between one asset type and another.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why must the growth rate stay below the discount rate?
Because the underlying sum only converges when it does. The value is an infinite series of discounted payments, and each term is a fixed multiple of the one before it. While that multiple stays below one the series has a finite total; once growth reaches or passes the discount rate it does not, and the arithmetic either divides by zero or produces a negative figure with no valuation meaning. The calculator tests the condition before computing, so entering a growth rate at or above the discount rate returns an explanation rather than a number.
How does the model apply to dividend-paying shares?
The Gordon model treats a share as a growing perpetuity of dividends, so the first-year dividend takes the place of the cash flow and a long-run dividend growth rate takes the place of the growth input. Its assumptions, a single constant growth rate and an uninterrupted stream, sit closest to companies whose dividend history has been steady over a long stretch. Where dividends have been cut, suspended or grown erratically, the single-rate assumption is carrying more weight than the record supports.
Is there a ceiling on the growth rate?
There is, and it comes from arithmetic rather than convention. A cash flow growing faster than the wider economy forever would eventually exceed the whole economy, so a perpetual growth rate above long-run nominal economic growth describes something that cannot persist. Two ceilings apply at once, and the binding one is whichever sits lower: the economic ceiling, or the discount rate entered. Where the discount rate is set below long-run economic growth, the model's own convergence requirement is the tighter of the two.
Why is terminal value so sensitive to these inputs?
Discounted cash flow terminal values are highly sensitive to this calculation: because the value depends on the spread between the discount and growth rates, a small change in either can shift the valuation substantially. Narrowing the spread from five points to one lifts the multiple from 20 to 100, so a terminal value can quintuple on a four point move in assumptions that are themselves estimates. Testing a range illustrates that sensitivity better than a single point estimate.
Why is the result twenty times the first-year cash flow?
Because dividing by a spread of five percentage points is the same as multiplying by twenty. The multiple shown in the result card is one divided by the spread, so it depends only on the two rates and not at all on the size of the cash flow. A three point spread would give a multiple of 33.33, and a ten point spread a multiple of 10. Reading the output as a multiple often travels further than reading it as an absolute amount, because the multiple is the part carrying the valuation assumption.
Does the first cash flow arrive today or in a year?
In a year. The formula values a payment at the end of the first period, then each later payment one period further out, and discounts all of them back to today. A cash flow already received is not part of the stream and belongs outside the calculation. Treating a payment in hand as the first-year figure shifts the whole stream one period early, which multiplies the answer by one plus the discount rate, so the overstatement equals the discount rate exactly whatever the two rates are.

Related Calculators

More Investing Calculators

Explore Other Financial Tools

Spotted something off?

Calculations or display — let us know.