Skip to content
FinToolSuite
Updated 2026-08-17 · Investing · Educational use only ·
Privacy

Information Ratio Calculator

Excess return per unit of active risk.

Calculate the information ratio: excess return over a benchmark divided by tracking error, showing the return earned per unit of active risk.

What this tool does

This calculator computes the information ratio, a metric that expresses active manager performance as excess return relative to benchmark divided by the volatility of that excess return. The result shows return per unit of active risk, illustrating how efficiently a portfolio's outperformance or underperformance is achieved compared to its benchmark. Portfolio return, benchmark return, and tracking error are the primary inputs that determine the outcome. A typical application is assessing whether a manager's returns justify the active risk taken. The calculator groups the output into illustrative bands to give the number some context. Note that this tool models historical or hypothetical scenarios for illustration only and does not account for fees, tax impacts, or future market conditions. Results reflect the inputs provided and describe one measurement window rather than a portfolio in full.

Quick answer: with the default values, the result is 1.00 (Information Ratio). Adjust the values below for your own figures.


Enter Values

People also use

Formula Used
Information ratio
Portfolio return
Benchmark return
Tracking error

Disclaimer

Results are estimates for educational purposes only. They do not constitute financial advice. Consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions.

The information ratio divides active return by tracking error. Active return is the portfolio return minus the benchmark return, and tracking error is the standard deviation of that difference over the same window. With a portfolio at 13%, a benchmark at 11% and tracking error of 2 percentage points, active return is 2 points and the ratio is 1.00: one point of excess return for each point of active risk taken.

The result card groups the number into one of four illustrative bands: 1.00 and above, 0.50 to under 1.00, 0.00 to under 0.50, or below 0.00. Those cut-points are this calculator's own grouping rather than a formally defined scale. A ratio below zero means the portfolio trailed its benchmark across the window measured. Where a figure sits in that range says nothing on its own about whether the same result repeats.

A tracking index fund does not land at zero. Fees, sampling and cash drag leave a small negative active return, and the tracking error underneath it is also small, so the ratio is a quotient of two small numbers. Its sign is reliably negative, but its size is governed by the ratio of drag to tracking error and is not bounded near zero: 0.05 points of drag against 0.02 points of tracking error produces −2.50. A tightly run full-replication tracker can therefore post a more negative figure than a loose one, because the smaller denominator magnifies the same drag. Where tracking error is genuinely zero the ratio has no value at all, because the division has no denominator, and the calculator returns a message in place of a number.

What moves the number most

The two return inputs are linear levers and mirror each other. At a tracking error of 2 points, a 1-point move in either return shifts the ratio by 0.50, upward for the portfolio and downward for the benchmark, and because both are linear, that step is the same size in both directions at any starting value. Tracking error is the one that behaves differently. Sitting in the denominator makes its effect hyperbolic and asymmetric: cutting it from 2 points to 1 lifts the ratio from 1.00 to 2.00, a step of a full point, while raising it from 2 to 3 drops the ratio to 0.67, a step of a third. Measured as discrete one-point steps, the tracking error lever is the odd one out at every starting value, defaults included. The three levers coincide only under the instantaneous-slope reading, and then only where the ratio is exactly 1.00.

The formula behind this

Information ratio = active return / tracking error. The denominator is tracking error rather than total volatility, and that is what separates this measure from the Sharpe ratio. Total volatility includes the market movement the benchmark already carries, while tracking error strips that out and leaves only the variability the manager introduced by deviating. The ratio therefore answers a narrower question than Sharpe does: how much return each unit of deviation from the benchmark produced.

What the ratio cannot separate

A high figure can come from manager skill or from a benchmark that was a poor match for the mandate, and the arithmetic cannot tell those apart. A portfolio measured against an index it was never built to track shows large active return and large tracking error, so the ratio that comes out of that pairing describes the mismatch as much as the management. An easy benchmark distorts the figure by a different route: it lifts active return, while a mandate that stays close to that benchmark keeps tracking error low, so both terms of the quotient push the ratio in the same direction.

Example Scenario

(13% − 11%) / 2% TE = 1.00.

Inputs

Portfolio Return %:13%
Benchmark Return %:11%
Tracking Error %:2%
Expected Result1.00
Expected Result breakdown
Active Return2.00%
IR Change per 1pp Active Return0.50
IR Band (Illustrative)1.00 and above

This example uses sample figures for illustration. Adjust the inputs above to match a specific situation and see how the result changes.

Sources & Methodology

Methodology

This calculator computes the information ratio, a measure of active management performance relative to the risk taken. The calculation subtracts the benchmark return from the portfolio return to derive active return, then divides that result by tracking error, the standard deviation of active return over the measurement period. The output expresses how much excess return was generated per unit of active risk. The model assumes returns and tracking error remain consistent over the period measured. It does not account for transaction costs, market impact, portfolio turnover, survivorship bias, or the statistical significance of the ratio itself. Results are sensitive to the choice of benchmark and measurement period, and the tool takes no period input, so both figures must be entered on the same annualised basis for the ratio to describe anything coherent.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is the information ratio usually read?
This calculator groups the result into four bands: 1.00 and above, 0.50 to under 1.00, 0.00 to under 0.50, and below 0.00. Those cut-points are the calculator's own grouping rather than a formally defined scale, and a ratio below zero means the portfolio trailed its benchmark across the window measured. Where a given figure falls depends on the strategy, the asset class, the length of the window and the benchmark chosen. Two managers showing the same ratio against different benchmarks are not describing the same thing.
How does it differ from the Sharpe ratio?
Both divide a return by a measure of risk, but they use different pairs. The information ratio takes return above a benchmark and divides it by tracking error, the variability of that excess. The Sharpe ratio takes return above a baseline cash rate and divides it by total volatility. The information ratio therefore isolates what a manager added or lost by deviating from the benchmark, while the Sharpe ratio describes the whole portfolio's risk-adjusted return including the market exposure the benchmark already carries. A fund tracking an index closely can show a positive Sharpe ratio while its information ratio is negative, because almost all of its return came from the benchmark rather than from deviation.
How long a window does the ratio need?
Short windows carry a lot of noise. Over one to three years the figure moves with market conditions the manager did not choose, and separating those from active decisions is difficult. Common practice in manager evaluation is to look at five years or more, with ten giving a steadier reading, though no window length turns a backward-looking ratio into evidence about what comes next. The calculator takes no period input, so whatever window the return and tracking error figures came from is the window the result describes.
What does the information ratio miss?
It treats upside and downside deviation identically, so a record containing one severe loss can produce the same figure as a record without one, and it says nothing about the size of the worst drawdown along the way. Figures quoted in fund marketing are usually drawn from funds that lasted the full period, so funds that closed are absent from the averages, although survivorship-bias-free databases do exist. Style drift, where a mandate shifts during the measurement window, makes two figures hard to compare even when both are calculated correctly. Fee treatment varies between sources. What a single ratio omits is visible in a drawdown measure and in the fund's own documentation.
Do both figures have to cover the same period?
Yes. The ratio only means something when the return figures and the tracking error come from the same window on the same convention. An annualised return divided by a tracking error measured on monthly data that was never annualised produces a number, but not the information ratio. Fund factsheets usually state the basis alongside the figure. Where two sources disagree, the ratio inherits the mismatch without signalling that it has done so.

Related Calculators

More Investing Calculators

Explore Other Financial Tools

Spotted something off?

Calculations or display — let us know.